Comments on: Queen Elizabeth II Descended from the Prophet Muhammad

By: Mrlopez2681

Mrlopez2681 — Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:36:00 +0000

It’s not all that amazing. All people have so-called “Arab” descendants if one was to trace ancestors back far enough – most people who are of southern European descent are descended from so-called “Arabs” (i.e. Spanish, Portuguese, Italian, Greek, etc., hence the dark features).

By: One Mind

One Mind — Fri, 23 Dec 2011 05:03:00 +0000

First, it’s Edward III, NOT Edward IV through whom Elizabeth II descends from Muhammad. Second, only in the European west is documentation insisted upon as proof of descent from anyone. Arab, and for that matter, the world’s genealogical standard of proof of descent has always been, not documents, but family tradition. If Elizabeth II cannot claim a descent from Muhammad, then NO ONE can, since no one has documentation to back it, no prince, no Emir, no Sharif, no Pasha, no oil sheik, not any of them. But I DARE any one to say that to their faces. If documentation is superior to family tradition as proof, it is only by comparison. One could just as easily say to the documentation crowd, “Since DNA is superior to documentation by orders of magnitude as proof of descent, mere documentation is no longer sufficient, since (following the flawed logic of the Documentarianists)DNA is to documentation, what documentation is to family tradition.”

By: Anon

Anon — Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:59:00 +0000

All but a very small section of DNA is reshuffled with every new generation. That’s why you’re not the same as your father or mother. All your ancestors’ DNA has been reshuffled to make you. Geneticists look for a specific stable marker to look at migration patterns tens of thousands of years ago. So it’s safe to claim to be a descendant of Prophet Mohammad as this is and will remain unverifiable scientifically. Don’t forget the British Royal family also claim descent from the Annunaki (seriously). In the Middle Ages the royals flaunted that lie (now they don’t or they’d be laughed at). Now, in the times when Islam has some currency, they parade the idea indirectly that they are sayyeds. It’s bull.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 25 Apr 2011 01:48:00 +0000

Recent posts on the Internet say that prince William is the anti crist And will be killed by Jesus when he returns who do u believe

By: Charlatan ?

Charlatan ? — Mon, 04 Apr 2011 15:47:32 +0000

Queen Elizabeth II Descended from the Prophet Muhammad |http://goo.gl/TwBWo

By: mehmood s al-memani

mehmood s al-memani — Sun, 03 Apr 2011 21:25:49 +0000

http://t.co/VibPYuk

By: Fdfd

Fdfd — Thu, 24 Mar 2011 20:28:00 +0000

This is based on two false premises:
1) that the princesses of Castile were descended from Zaida (and not the other concubines). and
2)that Zaida was descended from Muhammed.

There is no evidence to support either one or two.

By: Urnotez

Urnotez — Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:33:00 +0000

Wishful thinking. Absolutley no concrete evidence, just hear’say.

By: genealogy

genealogy — Thu, 06 May 2010 18:13:06 +0000

It is all interconnected and it should not be a surprise that Queen Elizabeth!

By: tina

tina — Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:08:02 +0000

thats rubbish queen is not related to holy prophet, british royal family are messed up and un religious and shameful killing own people, dvorces, sex before marraige etc . anyone who thinks this sould be discusted